Yes, USCG approval is important. But I'd be inclined to consider using them only in this particular case, due to the likelihood of needing to replace the filters multiple times. I'd certainly suggest that USCG regs be followed for any regular setup.
Most of the USCG regs for fuel filters seems to be related to the 'out of sight, out of mind' problem. That and an engine room fire. A fragile glass cylinder could crack due to wave action or other vibration, leading to a potential leak that might not get noticed quickly enough. A plastic cylinder, or water separator bowl, might not withstand the potential heat of a fire in the engine compartment. A fire that might otherwise be dealt with until the addition of leaking gasoline. So you can see where they're coming from with their requirements.
I can respect that. But I'm also practical regarding the considerable added expense of replacing a bunch of the larger filter canisters. Given the unique situation it might not be unreasonable to use personal judgment to best solve the problem. If you're fine with the cost of the larger filters and value the piece of mind following regs offers then certainly follow that course. Me, I'd suffer the added hassle of emptying those tanks instead of dealing with filter after filter, etc. Using unapproved, but workable, inline filters probably falls somewhere in the middle. Oh, and at no point am I suggesting that those filters remain in place for the duration. I'm only suggesting their use as a temporary solution and that they be removed once it's solved.
_________________ -Bill Kearney, 2005 348 Vista
|