cougarcruiser wrote:
To say that QA at Four Winns is the same as other companies is a very naive statement. Honestly, between build quality and materials used - I would say that even if QC is equal - FW is still a better offering than other companies.
you really think that QC at Bayliner is the same as QC at FW? Really? I'd push back on that one.
CC, to me, Four Winns has the best style boat out there, I really like the layouts, gages, hardware, ect.... I totally agree you can not compare a bayliner to FW. I go to the boat shows every year and still have yet to find a boat I like better than FW.
BUT, I think that Four Winns is FAR from where a good manufacture should be as far as delivering a quality product right the first time. Many posts here are very concerned about warranty work. If it was done right the 1st time, there would not be a need for warranty. I know, I know, there is not a manufacture that makes perfect product that never fails or has issues. If you compare the boat/RV industry to the automotive industry, automotive quality is far superior.
We all accept that we buy a boat/RV and know that it going back to the dealer for (with four winns a small punch list) a list of items that need fixing, replacement, adjustment, ect... and many times, our boats/RV go back a number of times.
When we buy automobiles we would freak out if it had to go back to dealer for a week for fixes/issues. Is your wife going to let the dealer keep her new car for two weeks while they do warranty work, NOT!!!! But yet, we all are happy with our boats being delivered to us sub par. Why is that, is it because they are toys?????
Bill described it better than I, there is a difference between process of building the boat and installing purchased hardware items. FW has no control over failure of purchased products.
Enough of me rambling. You get what I am saying.
_________________
2000 248 5.7L DP
'92, '94 SXI 750, '08 STX 15F, '12 Ultra LX 300
Videos