In the case of our boat, I would buy the $10,000+ increase for "increased quality" when comparing today's 240 to the 230's produced 10 years ago. I
don't buy it when comparing to 230's produced 3 years ago. I see no difference during that time frame, other than minor year-to-year trim changes, a new dash (which I frankly don't care for), and even more minor trailer updates. I think this argument applies to most of the models across the line, but of course it doesn't apply to new models introduced in the last year or two.
BarryBoats wrote:
2. With cash you can offer better customer service and be able to do the right things for customers without having to watch every penny. Four Winns has always given me outstanding service even on items out of warrantee. A cash strapped company cannot afford to do the right things for its customer.
I agree with the intent of your point, but unless you're talking strictly about warranty issues, service is all about your dealer, not FW. Some dealers are great on service and customer service issues, and some aren't - regardless of where the manufacturer sets the prices of their boats. I don't believe dealers see much of the additional cash from price increases, in fact they'll be the first to suffer if those increases cause a drop in sales - which is exactly the scenario I'm seeing in some of the dealers around here.
I'm not criticizing FW; I love ours and would buy another if quality of the boat were the only consideration. I can honestly say that based on quality and design, I'd sooner buy another FW before I'd buy a Cobalt, if money were no object. But if we were shopping for a new 240 today - equipped exactly the same as ours, built 3 years ago, and unimproved since then - there's a good chance we would not buy it based on today's price. This isn't a narrow-minded view, it's recognition of the fact that it's more money than we're comfortable paying for what it is.
You want a 35% increase on a 338 in just a few years ("few" meaning ~3 to most people)? That statement makes me wonder if you're in that tiny group of people who can and will buy regardless of price. If a 10% per year increase is good, wouldn't a 50% per year increase be better?
Said another way, many people these days don't get 6% pay increases reliably every year, let alone 10%. If a family has been kicking tires the last few years trying to decide whether or not to jump in, these increases may push them out. Again, I realize that little (if any) of the increases are profiteering on FW's part.
I mentioned today in another forum that we've occasionally considered selling. The bottom line for us is that if we were to sell, it would only be after we feel certain that we won't ever want to be boat owners again. Compared to the way boat prices are going now, the one we have is a bargain and we won't be able to afford another new one.
I respect everyone's opinions on this, I just think the increases are too much, too fast for a lot of folks.