PDACPA wrote:
we lose some privacy when in public.
You do realize that makes no sense, right? Being in public has never been private, by practice nor by literal definition.
There just seems to be a dis-associative aspect to how people handle online presentation of information. Just because it was harder to get as much information in the past doesn't make it wrong for it to become easier.
Fundamentally, who cares if there's a picture of you and your kids in front of your house. Without a caption explaining it as such how would anyone "know"? That's not more a "problem" than if the pictures had been taken on a busy downtown street. Again, without captions who would know? Or care, for that matter.
I'd wonder if your friends have used registered mail and/or FedEx to contact Google and make a formal request. Nothing like using the postal system to notify a company of a problem and to seek a solution. Just sending an e-mail or posting on a web forum is basically worthless. But get someone's signature on a delivery and you start the ball rolling on liability risks.
All this reminds me of a comment made at a conference in the early days of work I did on things like RSS and weblogs. One person actually complained that these open formats were going to make it "too easy" for people to get information. I questioned him a bit and it became clear that as a consultant he was depending upon being 'the source' of information for his clientele. He couldn't wrap his head around the fact that their being able to obtain more information would actually make his abilities more valuable. Being an insider is only good for so long. When everyone has access to the same information they eventually find themselves overwhelmed. Thus making those that can filter for the truly valuable information even more important. My point is technology and the easier availability of information isn't the problem. It's people's inability to grasp that their "privacy" never existed. Just like reminiscing about the good old days that never were.