Jim_R wrote:
Wonder if Volvo or Merc would void warranty if a hydrofoil was installed.
I did have a hydrofoil on my old 16' Maxim. It had a Alpha on it, and I did have problems over the years - linkage, gimbal bearings, bellows. Can't blame it all on the hydrofoil, or can I? Now that I think back, the frequency and number of problems did increase drastically in the years following the hydrofoil install. Never really thought about it in this way before.
I suppose its possible, but also possible those issues would have happened anyway as your previous boat got older. Like I said, I have one on my current boat and used one on my previous boat without issues. I've searched for incidents, but haven't found any other than a few cases of the hydrofoil breaking off and taking pieces of the stearn drive fin(s) with it. These cases seem small in number compared to the number of people using them. Seems like to me that since the hydrofoil is in most cases made of plastic and held on by a couple of screws it would break before anything else, but I could be wrong.
I understand the part that if VP or Merc thought the drive should have a hydrofoil they would have put one on there. However, not every boat needs a hydrofoil and they make these drives for a lot of different boats and applications. My boat, being a 5.0 SX drive on a heavy boat has difficulty getting on plane with a lot of folks on board and suffers from prop washout. The hydrofoil has almost elimated these problems, but if the same 5.0 SX drive were on a smaller boat like a 190 or if there were say two 5.0 SX drives with trim tabs on a cruiser, than a hydrofoil probably wouldn't be necesary. These are examples of course, but hopefully you understand what I'm saying...
_________________
2008 FW F204 - 5.0 VP "
Stand On It"
Former Boat: Larson 186 LXI - 4.3 VP

