www.iFourWinns.com

Dedicated to Current and Future Owners
It is currently Wed May 07, 2025 6:13 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Potential new H210 owner
PostPosted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:04 am 
Offline
Tadpole

Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:56 am
Posts: 2
First post on this forum but hoping it's not my last. I went in to look at a used sea ray the other day and walked out strongly considering a new H210. I love the extra capacity and the roomy feel of the hull configuration. I'm looking at a few good deals but the best one happens to have the 5.0 bravo 3 instead of the alpha. Does the bravo 3 make any sense on 21ft boat with under 300 hp? I'm thinking this could be the reason the best deal is on this particular set up despite the bravo 3 being a higher cost option. Anyway, any advice would be appreciated. While I've been on boats my entire life this would be my first as an owner. Thanks in advance.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:30 am 
Offline
Minnow

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 3:24 pm
Posts: 12
Location: Melvin Village, NH
There is no problem with the Bravo 3 on that boat- just about all of the Horizon 210's that we stock here are single prop drives (we run mainly Volvo Penta) but other than cost, there is really no disadvantage to the Bravo 3. (Impact cost could be slightly higher, but that is what insurance companies are for!) You will have a wicked hole shot swinging the two props. You will also get much smoother shifting with the Bravo drive than the Alpha, and your resale will be better. Hope this helps!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:55 pm 
Offline
Tadpole

Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:56 am
Posts: 2
melvinvillagemarina wrote:
There is no problem with the Bravo 3 on that boat- just about all of the Horizon 210's that we stock here are single prop drives (we run mainly Volvo Penta) but other than cost, there is really no disadvantage to the Bravo 3. (Impact cost could be slightly higher, but that is what insurance companies are for!) You will have a wicked hole shot swinging the two props. You will also get much smoother shifting with the Bravo drive than the Alpha, and your resale will be better. Hope this helps!


Thanks. I was thinking it would actually hurt resale based on the extra costs of maintenance and replacement parts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:34 pm 
Offline
Villiage Idiot

Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 8:28 pm
Posts: 1405
Location: Kansas City
Weather you are turing a Bravo 3, Alpha, VP, or B1 like I have, a 5.0 will be a POOCH for that boat. I recommend 5.7/350. That's 300hp for a little over 3000 lbs... all in all a very good HP to weight ratio. Less than that, and uh....

_________________
Walt B
"Debt-Charged"
Black '07 H210SS
6.2L Bravo One turning a 21P HIFive
Wakeboard Tower with Perfect Pass Stargazer version
Missouri River; Kansas City, Mo.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:38 pm 
Offline
Minnow

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 3:24 pm
Posts: 12
Location: Melvin Village, NH
Your only maintenance cost that would outweigh the alpha (or Bravo 1 or Volvo Penta SX drive) would be gearcase oil changes. If you happen to slam a rock- repair costs are more, but as I said before, that's where insurance comes in! As far as the last post, I can tell you from experience that this boat goes pretty good with the 4.3L V6 225HP, but great with the V8. We have stocked a few Signature Series with the 300HP 5.7V8 and it's a rocketship. Nobody ever said there was too much horsepower!!! The 260/270HP 5.0L pulls great out of the hole, and runs mid 50's (according to the speedometer) with a decent sized crew. Good luck with the new boat, it sounds good to me!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 7:31 am 
Offline
Villiage Idiot

Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 8:28 pm
Posts: 1405
Location: Kansas City
I test drive a 21' Ebbtide with a 5.0/A1. It was a pooch with only me, salesman, and 1/2 gas. Add a B3 leg, and you are just adding drag, and twice as many gears as needed to do the job. I have a friend with a 21' Cobalt and 320 HP Volvo DP. He and I are neck-in-neck on hole shot and top-end when running my combo. We see a few forum members claiming much higher top-end for the same combo I have, however I am only able to hit 50-52 by GPS depending on how I prop it, and still get acceptible hole-shot for water sports and load out.

I inquired before my purchase, and did not see any real advantage to having a dual prop set up in this size boat.

Also, I can't imagine having an SS without CC exhaust. The 5.0 would still sound OK, but a 4.3 in an SS?????

Best of luck on your research.... you can never have too much boat; you can never have too much HP; but you can definately have too much boat for your HP.

_________________
Walt B
"Debt-Charged"
Black '07 H210SS
6.2L Bravo One turning a 21P HIFive
Wakeboard Tower with Perfect Pass Stargazer version
Missouri River; Kansas City, Mo.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:26 am 
Offline
email admin your custom rank

Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:03 am
Posts: 2238
Location: Winthrop, Ma.
The big difference between the 2 drives are, or at least to me.

On the alpha, the raw water impeller is built into the drive. So you need to split the drive to get at it. On the B3, its on the engine. So the boat can remain in the water and its much easier for you to do. Also cheaper if you want the dealer to do it.

The B3 has 2 counter rotating props on it. Which takes out what some boaters call "prop walk". So in docking or slow speeds, the boat will go were ever you point it. Not so on a Alpha.

The Alpha uses a AL prop were the B3 uses a S.S. prop. So the B3 will give you better MPG and better all around performance. BUT the AL prop will bend over fast & easier if you hit something. Were the S.S. prop is harder and send more of the shock into the drive.

If it was me, I would go with the B3!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:24 am 
Offline
Villiage Idiot

Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 8:28 pm
Posts: 1405
Location: Kansas City
Paul I. wrote:
The big difference between the 2 drives are, or at least to me.

On the alpha, the raw water impeller is built into the drive. So you need to split the drive to get at it. On the B3, its on the engine. So the boat can remain in the water and its much easier for you to do. Also cheaper if you want the dealer to do it.

The B3 has 2 counter rotating props on it. Which takes out what some boaters call "prop walk". So in docking or slow speeds, the boat will go were ever you point it. Not so on a Alpha.

The Alpha uses a AL prop were the B3 uses a S.S. prop. So the B3 will give you better MPG and better all around performance. BUT the AL prop will bend over fast & easier if you hit something. Were the S.S. prop is harder and send more of the shock into the drive.

If it was me, I would go with the B3!


Paul,
I respectfully disagree with you on a few of your major points....

The Alpha impeller is much easier to change...but only if trailered! (the only gripe I have about the B1)

For me, I prefer "prop-walk" when docking; it allows me to move the boat side-ways up to the dock. (personal preference)

Al vs SS.... you are allowed, and IMO encouraged to use an SS on Alpha, or B1 drives. We have beat the whole argument to death on that, so I wont go there.

The B3 will give you LOWER MPG and LOWER TOP END, as you are turning twice as much gearing, and have twice as much drag (2 propellers) in the water. As pointed out in my previous, you get about the same hole-shot and top end as a lower pitch 5 blade prop on a B1 compared to a VP DP (and likely similar for B3 with same gear ratio)

From an ease of maint perspective, I recommend the B1 drive... it's rated to something like 600 HP and 100 MPH (alpha is rated to 300 HP), remove the prop to change the drive oil; but the impeller is underneath the engine.... at least Volvo did that part right (front of engine).

_________________
Walt B
"Debt-Charged"
Black '07 H210SS
6.2L Bravo One turning a 21P HIFive
Wakeboard Tower with Perfect Pass Stargazer version
Missouri River; Kansas City, Mo.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 2:59 pm 
Offline
email admin your custom rank

Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:03 am
Posts: 2238
Location: Winthrop, Ma.
Walt wrote:
Paul I. wrote:
The big difference between the 2 drives are, or at least to me.

On the alpha, the raw water impeller is built into the drive. So you need to split the drive to get at it. On the B3, its on the engine. So the boat can remain in the water and its much easier for you to do. Also cheaper if you want the dealer to do it.

The B3 has 2 counter rotating props on it. Which takes out what some boaters call "prop walk". So in docking or slow speeds, the boat will go were ever you point it. Not so on a Alpha.

The Alpha uses a AL prop were the B3 uses a S.S. prop. So the B3 will give you better MPG and better all around performance. BUT the AL prop will bend over fast & easier if you hit something. Were the S.S. prop is harder and send more of the shock into the drive.

If it was me, I would go with the B3!


Paul,
I respectfully disagree with you on a few of your major points....

The Alpha impeller is much easier to change...but only if trailered! (the only gripe I have about the B1)

For me, I prefer "prop-walk" when docking; it allows me to move the boat side-ways up to the dock. (personal preference)

Al vs SS.... you are allowed, and IMO encouraged to use an SS on Alpha, or B1 drives. We have beat the whole argument to death on that, so I wont go there.

The B3 will give you LOWER MPG and LOWER TOP END, as you are turning twice as much gearing, and have twice as much drag (2 propellers) in the water. As pointed out in my previous, you get about the same hole-shot and top end as a lower pitch 5 blade prop on a B1 compared to a VP DP (and likely similar for B3 with same gear ratio)

From an ease of maint perspective, I recommend the B1 drive... it's rated to something like 600 HP and 100 MPH (alpha is rated to 300 HP), remove the prop to change the drive oil; but the impeller is underneath the engine.... at least Volvo did that part right (front of engine).



I respectfully disagree with you, too. (just to make a joke out of it)

I have owned both and if it was between the two, I would pick the B3. You can do the B3 impeller anywhere. It also depends on the boat, meaning how much room is up front. In the engine compartment.

As to the "prop walk", I don't miss it at all. It also depend on what side you dock on and if your in forward or reverse. So an alpha can pull you into the dock or away from it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:20 am 
Offline
Guppy

Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:01 pm
Posts: 6
Ok I may be new to this forum, and to four winns for that matter, but not to boats. Go with the dual prop! The responsiveness is unmatched especially with multiport fuel injection driving it! Ok, I'll be reasonable because I'm all about a good deal too, if the alpha is that much cheaper and you are willing to "do the dance" around what pitch prop is best for your needs then the answer is YES I do believe that you can find your desired performance with the alpha.

As a sidenote and possibly a selling point, just look at the simple physics of it; the output from the first or primary prop becomes the input for the second prop.... BRILLIANT! It's called technology and if/when the time comes to sell, the buyer is not willing to spend a thousand or two more for that then we will all be here for him on forums just like this to help him throughout his "dance" to figure out what pitch prop is best suited for his needs ;)

_________________
2001 Horizon 230
5.7 GXI DP


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group