www.iFourWinns.com

Dedicated to Current and Future Owners
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 3:33 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:13 pm 
Offline
Tadpole

Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:07 pm
Posts: 1
Hi All,

Looking at purchasing my first boat. Went to the local Four Winns dealer (Im in Ontario) and he suggested the F224. It's a 23'8" boat, but that includes the swim deck (it's 22' without the swim deck). I live 10 minutes from Lake Ontario, near the mouth of the St Lawrence river, and I've been told to get at least a 22' boat for that lake. I want to make sure I get the right size boat so Im also considering the H240, which is 24' (no swim deck). My question is, will I notice the 2 foot difference if I buy one or the other?

My main concerns are handling and the boat being sufficient for Lake Ontario.

Thanks

**edit** The F224 is actually 21' plus 2'8" for the swim deck, totaling 23'8"


Last edited by Scrif on Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:54 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:31 pm 
Offline
Minnow

Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:32 pm
Posts: 10
Scrif wrote:
Hi All,

Looking at purchasing my first boat. Went to the local Four Winns dealer (Im in Ontario) and he suggested the F224. It's a 23'8" boat, but that includes the swim deck (it's 22' without the swim deck). I live 10 minutes from Lake Ontario, near the mouth of the St Lawrence river, and I've been told to get at least a 22' boat for that lake. I want to make sure I get the right size boat so Im also considering the H240, which is 24' (no swim deck). My question is, will I notice the 2 foot difference if I buy one or the other?

My main concerns are handling and the boat being sufficient for Lake Ontario.

Thanks


Looking forward to this one as well. I was told I should consider 22'-24' for Lake Norman and went with a 21'. A lot of it is the depth of the boat. An example would be a guys 24' ski boat that is so "short" that it's not a good boat for the lake (530 miles of shoreline). But a 20' "tall" boat like a Hurricane Deck Boat would be more than enough.

A primary concern for me was keeping it small enough to be fun, while still big enough for the lake. I didn't want to drive a minivan if i didn't have to! :mrgreen:

_________________
2006 Four Winns Horizon 210
5.7 320hp Volvo GXi - closed cooling

Lake Norman, Charlotte NC


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:12 pm 
Offline
email admin your custom rank

Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:56 pm
Posts: 1046
Location: Millhaven, ON
Scrif wrote:
Hi All,

Looking at purchasing my first boat. Went to the local Four Winns dealer (Im in Ontario) and he suggested the F224. It's a 23'8" boat, but that includes the swim deck (it's 22' without the swim deck). I live 10 minutes from Lake Ontario, near the mouth of the St Lawrence river, and I've been told to get at least a 22' boat for that lake. I want to make sure I get the right size boat so Im also considering the H240, which is 24' (no swim deck). My question is, will I notice the 2 foot difference if I buy one or the other?

My main concerns are handling and the boat being sufficient for Lake Ontario.

Thanks


You must be near me... Come buy mine :) . It will handle anything Lake Ontario can throw at you !!!

As for the F vs H series... people say the bowriders handle waves better because of the V nose. I've never been on a funship though.

_________________
Marc, Kathlin & Nathalie

Image
'89 Chaparral Laser 32

'93 Vista 245, 5.8L w/ King Cobra

Former Boats
'01 H260, 7.4 VP Duoprop
'98 H200, 5.0 GL w/VP SX drive


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:33 pm 
Offline
email admin your custom rank

Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:58 pm
Posts: 236
Location: Urbandale, Ia
Spending that kind of money...insist on taking both out on the water and compare how they do in rough chop.

_________________
2005 Horizon 210, 5.7L Volvo
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:07 pm 
Offline
All Night Long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 12:03 am
Posts: 1899
Location: Lake Washington, Seattle, WA
The H240 is 24' including the platform and the back sunpads... that's alot of footage.

You really need to sit in both, and drive both. They are great boats.

Having owned a 240 - it's a fantastic lakeboat. It's got plenty of mass and sits deep in the water - it handles chop very well.

_________________
Image
2008 318 Vista -SOLD, but I am still around!
All Night Long, Seattle WA


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 8:12 pm 
Offline
email admin your custom rank

Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 9:59 pm
Posts: 226
Location: Lake Minnetonka, MN
In my opinion, comparing the two, I think you'll end up with the same amount of room, or even slightly more with the F224. They are almost the same length when you consider the swim platform. And, on the F, the front seating area is larger. I'd say it's close to a wash... get the boat you like best and can get the best deal on.

_________________
2008 Four Winns F224
5.0 Volvo Penta
Towing with Audi Q7 4.2 V8
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:28 pm 
Offline
email admin your custom rank

Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:36 am
Posts: 678
Location: Northshore Boston & 1000 Islands
We see many F224 in 1000 Island area… F224 has more room than H240 but H240 should ride better in rough water and takes chops better. Horizon is sportier looking than Funship in general, However, Funship is more practical for family use and economical… I do not think you can not go wrong with either one but for 1000 island area boating larger boat is a preferred if you can afford it. We used had H240 but now own H260 and 2’ difference is very noticeable on rough water of St Lawrence River…
We can always offer you a ride on our Horizon if you have a chance to come across a 1000 Island bridge to Alex Bay….
See you on water.

_________________
Image
08 H260 VP 8.1Gi DP.....Previous
2013 Crownline E6 Merc 8.2MAG BIIIX, DTS/SC


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 4:17 am 
Offline
Guppy

Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:30 pm
Posts: 8
+1 to trying both boats out in the water. Please post your impressions if you do this. We just got the F224and are very happy with it. We moved from a Freedom 190 and the F224 is much more stable.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 5:05 pm 
Offline
email admin your custom rank
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 10:17 am
Posts: 202
Location: Monticello, AR
I ran into a similar situation when I was buying, but my choices were the F204 I ended up going with, and the H210. Both were the nearly the same price in my case, but the we chose the F204 because it had noticably more room and features that the H210 didn't have. For example, you would think that the H210 would be larger than the F204 based on the number, but thats not the case. The F204 is actually 4" longer and weighs about 500lb more. It may not be as fast on the top end as the H210, but I haven't had any difficulties with handling it in rough lake waters. In addition, the F204 holds 10 more gallons of fuel, 2 additional passengers, and 12 gallons of fresh water (the H210 doesn't have a potable water system).

This also depends on personal taste and where you boat. The H210 is a great looking boat, perhaps even better looking than the F204, but having enough room for everyone was more important to us than looks. In my opinion FW's deck boats are probably the best looking deck boats on the market.

_________________
2008 FW F204 - 5.0 VP "Stand On It"
Former Boat: Larson 186 LXI - 4.3 VP
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 4:34 pm 
Offline
email admin your custom rank

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:05 pm
Posts: 179
Location: Lake Norman Denver NC
I like my 2006 H240. With the wake tower it's rated for 11 people, handles well, pulls skiers up even with a load of people on board (VP 5.7 duoprop). I have not tried the deck boat so cannot compare but I love the 240!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 3:34 pm 
Offline
Clownfish
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 10:47 am
Posts: 40
Location: Mooresville, NC
IMO, of course, but I think you will definitely get a better ride out of the larger hull. I went with a funship 264 for the chop on Lake Norman, and the more time I spend on the lake (especially on weekends) the happier I am with the larger hull even sacrificing a little ride quality versus a traditional bow rider (for the $$, I would have had to go a little smaller). I also really like the open layout of the Funship boats. We usually have between 6-10 people on the boat, tubing etc., and everyone likes the more open layout.

All things being equal (layout etc), I think bigger is almost always better.

_________________
2003 Funship 264
Volvo 8.1Gi DP
2007 Lincoln Navigator tow vehicle
Weekends on Lake Norman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:17 pm 
Offline
email admin your custom rank

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:05 pm
Posts: 179
Location: Lake Norman Denver NC
[quote="KDriskel"]IMO, of course, but I think you will definitely get a better ride out of the larger hull. I went with a funship 264 for the chop on Lake Norman, and the more time I spend on the lake (especially on weekends) the happier I am with the larger hull even sacrificing a little ride quality versus a traditional bow rider (for the $$, I would have had to go a little smaller). I also really like the open layout of the Funship boats. We usually have between 6-10 people on the boat, tubing etc., and everyone likes the more open layout.

Did you buy your FW from Lake Norman Marina?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:49 am 
Offline
Tadpole

Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:44 am
Posts: 3
From my point of view, to compare the two, I think you will find yourself with the same amount of room, or even a little more with F224. They are almost the same length if we consider the swim platform. And F is the largest area of the front seats. I would say it is close to a wash take the boat you like best and get the best deals.

_________________
DELETED BY ADMIN


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:29 am 
Offline
email admin your custom rank

Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:26 pm
Posts: 5662
Location: Long Island NY
Bigger is usually better, but one thing you want to look at is not just overall length but waterline length (not including swim platform) and most important is deadrise, the angle that the sides of the hull makes with the horizontal. If you look at the stern from the rear, notice how steep the angle is between the hull sides and the horizontal. A true deep vee hull (with a deadrise from about 20* on up) will ride much better than a hull with a shallower deadrise of the same hull length. Bowriders tend to have closer to a true deep vee than deck boats which are more of a shallow vee. My old 88 200 has a 21* deadrise, about the steepest ever offered on a Horizon and it handles rough water great, otherwise I would not take a boat that size into Long Island Sound on certain days.

_________________
88 Four Winns 200 Horizon
4.3 OMC Cobra-4bbl
2002 Walker Bay 10/2012 Suzuki 2.5
2008 Walker Bay 8

1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.0/Selectrac
2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee 5.7 Hemi/Quadradrive II


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 2:05 pm 
Offline
230 Mike
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 7:59 pm
Posts: 5141
Location: Kansas City, Table Rock Lake
Probably too late now to contribute anything to this thread, but we went through the same comparison (214 vs. 230 at the time; same boats). We went into it with every intention of buying a Funship. On the sea trial, it became clear that the top of the windshield cut right through the middle of my line of sight no matter how I adjusted the seat. We loved everything else about the boat, but that was a deal breaker and I wouldn't have known about it until it was too late, if I had only sat in it on the trailer.

The good news was that we found we could get the additional 2' of the 230/240 for not much more money than the 214/224, and most importantly, for almost exactly the same tow weight. With that in mind, we tested a 230/240 and the deal was done. I'm very happy it worked out the way it did. An SL series boat might be a good option to look at too.

_________________
Image

Mike
2005 Four Winns 230/240
VP 5.7GXi/DP
1998 F-150 XLT
Boat Pic


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group