Motor Mike wrote:
The 260 does seem neglected but the price is $1k below nada low(not including the trailer cost). So its a question of how much work and money.
The 280 has 260hp motors...so better yet. If what you say about the drop in gas milage is true (-1mpg) thats a costly hit. I do like to boat around some though...so that is a consideration. Its also been in fresh water only and not slipped.
I have a diesel truck so pulling a 280 isn't an issue issue except getting it in and out of my driveway entrance. I could get by without a permit as they are pretty lenient here since its 9'5".
I'll know more after we look at this FW 278 today though. Its got a white bottom paint.
298vista2000 - I would love a 300+ but to difficult to go to another lake with it. If my main lake was really large then I would get a 300+...but the lake I mostly go to(10miles away, Saguaro Lake) is not really big.
I hear ya on the 260, I cant talk because I took a chance on the 'not so nice' boat to save me nearly 10 grand, plus the SR came with a trailer. It wasnt really neglected by the previous owner I dont think, but like I said it sat at a dealer for quite a while and they never touched it except for winterizing.
My driveway is the problem for me also, plenty long but narrow apron and not a wide street in front of it, with a retaining wall on one side that isnt very forgiving, plus backing uphill is the best approach angle to boot. That limits the size of what I put on the driveway for sure, but I keep mine in a slip year round on a lift and only have to get it in the driveway a couple times a year. Permits are really no big deal here either, unless you get caught by the wrong guy.
Going by the boattest.com reviews for mpg, they put the 2004 SR 260 with a small block at 2.25mpg so the 280 isnt that bad of a hit looking at their numbers. Not sure how accurate they are but at least its something to go by.