We have the 348 (now 358) with v-drive inboards. It's very maneuverable. It's 'pivot point' is right about at the base of the windshield. And the digital throttles make it a snap to control the engines in all docking situations. I would HATE to have to use separate throttle/shifter sticks ever again.
I could see where the sterndrives would be nice to have. But for us, here in saltwater on the Chesapeake I prefer having just prop and shafts in the water, not whole I/O assemblies. The sterndrive setup is a little faster and slightly more fuel efficient. But don't kid yourself, the fuel dock is not going to be significantly less. I had a boat some years ago with I/O and just didn't want to repeat the maintenance (and sinking) headaches. In fresh water, yeah, I'd consider I/O's again.
I'm 6'4" and 250lbs and the 358's forward berth (with optional inner spring mattress) is great. I've slept on it most weekends during the season.
Likewise the interior cabin and the head are generous enough to let me move about quite easily. I've slept on the mid-cabin bed too. It's a full double-bed sized berth. I put a visco-elastic mattress topper over the cushion inserts and then just use regular full sheets on it.
I wouldn't dismiss the forward stateroom berth, we have it and it's nice. I probably would NOT get the mid-cabin stateroom option as I think it would make the cabin feel too small. But the forward one is great for a bit of added privacy when you have guests along. Now, I support you could get the mid-cabin wall and NOT the forward one. Then you'd have a 'room' that would help hide all the crap that normally gets stowed in the mid-cabin.
I would also hate to have Flexi-teek on the cockpit floor. It gets WAY TOO HOT on the swim platform, I can't imagine the misery it'd cause to have it in the cockpit too. It does provide excellent non-skid for the platform, but OUCH does it get hot in the sun.
I don't have the stainless windshield setup either. Why avoid it? Besides the added cost, of course. The standard powder coated frame has held up quite well and looks fine.
Ours came with a C-80 Raymarine chartplotter (and autopilot) and I upgraded it to an E-80 (to get weather, chart and networking options). Now that the C-80 can do weather it might be worth considering. The E-series are slightly faster (so I'm told) and support more chart detail. But I never, ever use the 3D chart features. The E-series have a few more benefits but that's something for another thread. I like what I see on the Garmin demos but a friend has a 5208 (I think) new one with touchscreen and I really don't like it. When bouncing along on the waves, or in bad weather, I MUCH prefer having hard buttons instead of a touchscreen. It's just too much hassle trying to tap, tap, double-tap in the right places.
I also agree, the other options are likewise must and nice-to haves.
I've seen a 338 at a boat show and liked what I saw. It wasn't available when we were shopping. We might well have considered it.
Where are you going to be boating?
As a side note, c'mon folks, update your profiles with a location, it makes it easier for folks to offer fresh/saltwater and other local advice!
_________________ -Bill Kearney, 2005 348 Vista
|